PDA

View Full Version : California Supreme Court Upholds "Impossible" Gun Law



gun sane
06-29-2018, 01:44 PM
We've all heard the old saw, "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." Well, the CA Supreme Court has now decreed that the "impossibility" of a law's requirements isn't a dodge either, especially when it comes to manufacturing guns to suit liberal wet dreams. By requiring new semi-auto handguns to stamp casings with identifiable markings, the anti-gunners expect the market to dry up like a Commiefornia desert reservoir.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/california/articles/2018-06-28/california-high-court-tosses-suit-over-bullet-stamping-law

ParaCav
06-30-2018, 09:09 AM
IL is in a similar situation.
Liberal House of Reps
Liberal Senate
Liberal State Supreme Court
Liberal U.S. Appeals Court
"I fought the Law and the Law Won!

wrdavis
06-30-2018, 02:04 PM
I suspect it will end up in the SCOTUS, and maybe be over ruled.

mitchr
06-30-2018, 05:50 PM
Didn't another state, maybe NY, try this & determine it wasn't feasible? If I were a gun manufacturer, the state just wouldn't get anymore of my products, 'course that's probably commiefornia's real goal.

John_R
06-30-2018, 08:04 PM
I can suggest a law that requires these politicians to perform a physical impossibility with their heads.

Vito Glisenti
06-30-2018, 08:44 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microstamping

gun sane
06-30-2018, 09:48 PM
The system may work if the bad guy is stupid enough to use a handgun that he purchased through an FFL. Otherwise, these judicial activists are only kidding themselves.

Reginald Carstairs
07-01-2018, 09:06 AM
The California Supreme Court is the Socialist branch of the ACLU.

This action tells me if a good guy buys a stamped gun via an FFL then he had better transfer it through another FFL if he plans on selling the firearm, or he is the main suspect if someone gets killed with it, no FTF sales. If this law stands then a new firing pin with a new micro stamp needs to be installed. Simple California tax fee of $200.00 for this transaction. Oh, yes a new waiting period of 2 months to get your custom microstamp.

I can see California implanting a chip in all of its residents. This way the state only needs to use the forearms microstamped serial number. How they do that you say? Well, then Sacramento just uploads it to the resident's chip. Of course, the chip will already have his DNA code, fingerprints and location transponder installed.

Do you know the sad thing about all of this is the people there will just love it because they want it? Yes, the chip fee of $5000.00 will be deducted from their pay, and that's is OK with them too.

Awww RC, your goofing off posting this..... Well, stand by for page two in the, not too distant future.

groberts
07-01-2018, 11:04 AM
RC, AFAIK all legal sales in California must go through an FFL anyway.

groberts
07-01-2018, 11:07 AM
The system may work if the bad guy is stupid enough to use a handgun that he purchased through an FFL. Otherwise, these judicial activists are only kidding themselves.
I wonder how this works for stolen guns. Does a person who reports one stolen have a serious burden of proof?